Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2017 Jul 5;547(7664):468–471. doi: 10.1038/nature23272

Extended Data Table 2.

Mutations analysis of changes in pEC50 and Emax

CB1 AM11542 AM841 CP55,940
pEC50 Emax (Fold) pEC50 Emax (Fold) pEC50 Emax (Fold)
WT 8.5 ± 0.21 2.3 ± 0.05 7.9 ± 0.12 2.5 ± 0.04 8.3 ± 0.15 2.3 ± 0.05
F177A 7.4 ± 0.17**** 2.0 ± 0.04 7.3 ± 0.20**** 2.5 ± 0.08 7.2 ± 0.14**** 2.2 ± 0.05
L193A 5.8 ± 0.06**** 1.9 ± 0.10 5.4 ± 0.35**** 2.3 ± 0.42 5.8 ± 0.15**** 2.2 ± 0.12
D213A 6.4 ± 0.18**** 1.6 ± 0.05*** 6.4 ± 0.14**** 1.8 ± 0.05**** 6.4 ± 0.14**** 1.6 ± 0.04****
Y275A 6.1 ± 0.19**** 2.1 ± 0.12 5.9 ± 0.22**** 2.3 ± 0.18 5.4 ± 0.95**** 1.5 ± 0.40****
Y275F 6.8 ± 0.21**** 2.1 ± 0.09 6.6 ± 0.13**** 2.5 ± 0.09 6.7 ± 0.13**** 2.3 ± 0.07
F379A 5.9 ± 0.25**** 2.0 ± 0.15 5.4 ± 0.30**** 2.6 ± 0.42 5.3 ± 0.40**** 2.2 ± 0.50
F379W 7.0 ± 0.12**** 2.0 ± 0.05 6.6 ± 0.20**** 2.5 ± 0.13 7.0± 0.15**** 2.2 ± 0.07
S383A <5 1.0 ± 0.02**** <5 1.6±0.51**** <5 1.3 ± 0.12****
T210A 7.5 ± 0.32** 1.9 ± 0.07** 7.4 ± 0.22 2.1 ± 0.06**** 6.9 ± 0.32*** 1.9 ± 0.09****
E273K 8.7 ± 0.14 2.5 ± 0.05* 8.1 ± 0.12 2.5 ± 0.06 8.7 ± 0.09 2.5 ± 0.04
T283V 8.8 ± 0.17 2.5 ± 0.06* 7.9 ± 0.16 2.5 ± 0.07 8.7 ± 0.25 2.7 ± 0.07**
R340E 8.6 ± 0.15 2.5 ± 0.05* 8.1 ± 0.17 2.5 ± 0.09 8.5 ± 0.30 2.5 ± 0.06

Inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation in wild-type and mutant CB1 CHO cells. Data are mean pEC50 and Emax values ± s.e.m. from fitting concentration–response data to nonlinear regression (3 parameter) analysis; n = 3 independent experiments performed in duplicate for all mutants except F177A (n = 4), T210A (n = 4 for AM841 and CP55,940) and wild type (n = 7 for AM841 and CP55,940; n = 6 for AM11542).

Compared to wild type with agonist treatment: *P < 0.05,

**

P < 0.01,

****

P < 0.0001 as determined by two-way ANOVA without repeated measures followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test. Statistical analyses were not performed on S383A as the pEC50 values were estimated at > 5 µM due to lack of response and non-convergence of the data to nonlinear regression analysis. The last four mutations represent those appearing in the crystal structure CB1 construct.