Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015 Sep;41(3):145–154. doi: 10.1363/4114515

Table 2.

Percentage distribution of provider-client contacts for contraception during the study period, by method type, provider type and location where contraceptive services were provided

Detail %
Method type (N=3,281)
Tubal ligation     1.7
Implant     5.6
IUD     0.0
Injectable   79.0
Pill   13.4
Removal of implant/IUD     0.3
Provider type (N=3,142)
Clinical officer     5.2
Medical assistant     1.4
Nurse   16.6
Health surveillance assistant   65.8
CBDA   11.0
Youth CBDA     0.2
Location (N=3,251)
Government facility   37.1
CHAM facility     3.4
NGO/private facility     1.4
Outreach post   14.1
Provider’s home   36.8
Woman’s home     7.0
Other     0.2
Total 100.0

Excludes condoms (male and female) and traditional methods. Notes: CBDA=Community-based distribution agent. CHAM=Christian Health Association of Malawi.

One contact was for IUD use.