. 2018 Feb 1;13(2):e0192343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192343

Table 2. Comparison of partial coding A. fatua sequences with transcripts retrived from RNA-seq assembled dataset.

Global pairwise alignment with free end gaps was conducted using Geneious software (Cost matrix: 65% similarity 5.0/-4.0; gap open penalty: 12; gap extension penalty:3).

Gene symbol	Partial coding A. fatua sequences^a		A. fatua transcripts^b		A. fatua putative gene homolog	Pairwise identity (%)
Gene symbol	Accession numbers	Sequence length (bp)	Transcript symbol	Transcript length (bp)	A. fatua putative gene homolog	Pairwise identity (%)
EF1a	KT153026	834	CL3197 contig1	1341	AfEF1a	94.6
GAPDH	KT153027	849	Unigene 36693	1011	AfGAPDH1	99.3
GAPDH	KT153027	849	Unigene 36695	1008	AfGAPDH2	83.2
TBP	KT153028	497	CL3311 contig2	570	AfTBP1	83.1
TBP	KT153028	497	CL4896 contig1	351	AfTBP2	97.5
TUA	KT153029	792	Unigene 36141	1218	AfTUA1	79.3
TUA	KT153029	792	Unigene 2539	957	AfTUA2	96.7

^a nucleotide sequences retrived from GeneBank database

^b nucleotide sequences retrived from RNA-seq assembled dataset