Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 18;2(2):211–222. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1135

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Pro‐C3/C3M ratio and disease severity in TIPS patients. (A) Significantly higher Pro‐C3/C3M ratio in patients with HRS. (B) Significantly higher Pro‐C3/C3M ratio in patients with severe ascites. (C) Patients with MELD score >11 and Child‐Pugh C show a significantly higher Pro‐C3/C3M ratio. (D) Significantly higher Pro‐C3/C3M ratio in patients with CLIF‐C AD score >49.5, and patients with Pro‐C3‐/C3M ratio >1.5 show significantly higher CLIF‐C AD scores. (E) Significant correlation of Pro‐C3/C3M ratio with ACLF. (F) Kaplan‐Meier stratified for Pro‐C3/C3M ratio at a threshold of 1.5 in the hepatic vein. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; data represent mean ± SEM.