Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 13.
Published in final edited form as: SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2017 Jul 13;28(6):525–539. doi: 10.1080/1062936X.2017.1343204

Table 3.

Statistics for LDA prediction set.

Target Species n Fraction
predicted*
Fraction
correct
Training set
sensitivity
Fungi 49 0.73 0.56 0.50
Insect 99 0.88 0.91 0.84
Plant 107 0.90 0.95 0.86
Rodent 2 1.00 1.00 0.93

Overall 257 0.86 0.87

MOA n Fraction predicted* Fraction correct Training set sensitivity

Anticoagulation 2 1.00 1.00 0.93
Biosynthesis inhibition 77 0.75 0.86 0.64
Growth regulation 35 0.71 0.72 0.65
Neurotoxicity 93 0.86 0.96 0.88
Photosynthesis modulation 26 0.65 0.94 0.52
Reactivity 7 0.57 0.25 0.57
Respiration modulation 17 0.47 0.38 0.38

Overall 257 0.75 0.86

Target species - MOA n Fraction predicted* Fraction correct Training set sensitivity

Fungi-Biosynthesis inhibition 31 0.71 0.59 0.42
Fungi-Reactivity 7 0.43 0.33 0.57
Fungi-Respiration modulation 11 0.45 0.40 0.21
Insect-Neurotoxicity 93 0.85 0.98 0.88
Insect-Respiration modulation 6 0.17 0.00 0.16
Plant-Biosynthesis inhibition 46 0.67 0.90 0.56
Plant-Growth Regulation 35 0.60 0.86 0.65
Plant-Photosynthesis modulation 26 0.62 1.00 0.52
Rodent-Anticoagulation 2 1.00 1.00 0.93

Overall 257 0.70 0.87
*

A minimum score of 0.5 was required to make a prediction.