Table 5. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA results for abundance of non-target arthropods with values weights greater than 0.5 and less -0.5 in the Principal Response Curves (PRC) analysis with first axis significant collected by Pitfall traps in non-Bt (with and without insecticides) and Bt (DAS-81419-2) soybean fields at two sites over two to three years in Brazil.

Site (year)	Non-target arthropods	Soybean treatments			Two-way ANOVA
		Non-sprayed non-Bt	Sprayed non-Bt	DAS-81419-2	Soybean treat. (A)		Sampling time (B)		Interaction (A x B)
					F	P	F	P	F	P
Montividiu (2012)	Canthon sp.	3.33 ± 0.99 a	5.75 ± 1.98 a	0.25 ± 0.18 b	17.01	0.011	1.22	0.381	2.67	0.070
	Elachiptera sp.	7.42 ± 1.60 a	7.42 ± 2.86 a	1.17 ± 0.36 b	46.87	0.002	1.97	0.220	1.13	0.400
	Labidura xanthopus	4.25 ± 1.19	3.42 ± 1.02	1.33 ± 0.39	3.99	0.112	2.10	0.202	1.82	0.177
	Euxesta sp.	3.33 ± 2.10	8.92 ± 3.95	0.42 ± 0.28	6.80	0.052	5.66	0.035	5.51	0.006
	Dorymyrmex brunneus	4.92 ± 1.92	6.42 ± 3.46	5.75 ± 2.29	0.24	0.795	8.97	0.012	2.22	0.113
Uberlândia (2011)	Condylostylus spp.	2.00 ± 0.63 b	0.92 ± 0.31 b	6.08 ± 1.99 a	19.44	0.009	5.57	0.036	9.56	< 0.001
	Pheidole sp.	6.75 ± 1.95	6.67 ± 1.50	17.00 ± 5.82	2.96	0.163	0.58	0.650	0.774	0.605
	Dorymyrmex brunneus	12.58 ± 3.91	6.42 ± 2.03	12.08 ± 3.60	0.99	0.445	5.04	0.044	1.45	0.276
	Selenophorus sp.	6.00 ± 1.54	26.17 ± 12.40	25.17 ± 11.97	1.13	0.409	25.89	< 0.001	2.57	0.077
	Elachiptera sp.	8.50 ± 2.55	8.00 ± 2.63	5.25 ± 2.61	0.51	0.635	8.48	0.014	0.48	0.809
	Drosophilidae spp.	9.83 ± 3.83	17.42 ± 8.65	5.08 ± 2.05	3.71	0.123	12.83	0.005	3.77	0.024

P-values highlighted in bold are statistically significant (α = 0.05).

Degrees of freedom: soybean fields = 2; sampling time = 3; interaction = 6; residual = 12.

Means (± SE) followed by different letters were significantly different within rows (Tukey’s test, α = 0.05).