Table 10.
MKL modelling of the comparison of ‘faces’ vs ‘scrambled’, based on the AAL atlas
Region | Contribution (%) | Size | ER |
---|---|---|---|
Precentral_L | 26.41 | 969.00 | 104.85 |
Cingulum_Mid_L | 18.72 | 557.00 | 103.85 |
Frontal_Inf_Tri_R | 9.96 | 474.00 | 98.12 |
Cuneus_L | 5.71 | 433.00 | 91.77 |
Pallidum_L | 5.18 | 71.00 | 98.88 |
Occipital_Inf_R | 5.11 | 275.00 | 99.12 |
Heschl_R | 4.94 | 67.00 | 95.31 |
Frontal_Inf_Oper_L | 3.96 | 296.00 | 71.96 |
Caudate_R | 3.79 | 243.00 | 86.85 |
Amygdala_L | 3.39 | 66.00 | 96.77 |
Vermis_7 | 1.45 | 19.00 | 65.04 |
Occipital_Mid_R | 1.42 | 560.00 | 51.00 |
Occipital_Mid_L | 1.29 | 954.00 | 60.96 |
SupraMarginal_L | 1.25 | 371.00 | 53.81 |
Frontal_Mid_Orb_R | 1.09 | 186.00 | 64.46 |
Frontal_Sup_Orb_L | 0.99 | 91.00 | 60.42 |
Angular_L | 0.98 | 330.00 | 57.08 |
Caudate_L | 0.65 | 228.00 | 14.85 |
Parietal_Inf_R | 0.58 | 340.00 | 32.27 |
Frontal_Mid_Orb_L | 0.55 | 214.00 | 18.12 |
Insula_R | 0.54 | 510.00 | 4.00 |
Cerebelum_Crus1_L | 0.54 | 73.00 | 21.92 |
Cingulum_Post_R | 0.32 | 94.00 | 14.50 |
Occipital_Sup_R | 0.31 | 386.00 | 17.85 |
Precuneus_L | 0.17 | 931.00 | 10.58 |
Postcentral_R | 0.14 | 855.00 | 3.65 |
Cingulum_Post_L | 0.10 | 141.00 | 10.35 |
Postcentral_L | 0.10 | 1060.00 | 3.62 |
Temporal_Sup_L | 0.09 | 702.00 | 3.65 |
Vermis_9 | 0.06 | 7.00 | 7.04 |
Angular_R | 0.06 | 469.00 | 3.62 |
Temporal_Mid_L | 0.06 | 1354.00 | 3.58 |
Paracentral_Lobule_R | 0.05 | 211.00 | 3.65 |
Lingual_R | 0.05 | 674.00 | 3.58 |
Frontal_Inf_Oper_R | 0.02 | 355.00 | 3.54 |
Occipital_Sup_L | 0.00 | 374.00 | 3.42 |
Pallidum_R | 0.00 | 75.00 | 3.31 |
Regions ranked further (i.e. rank >37) have a perfectly null contribution to the model. ER stands for Expected Ranking. The region size is displayed in voxels. The weights were averaged across folds (except for computing ER). A region label ending in ‘L’ (resp. ‘R’) means left (resp. right) hemisphere region