Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 30;9:59. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00059

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics of the stem water potential (ψs) data measured across the dates of the whole experiment in seasons 2015 and 2016, expressed in MPa.

Irrigation treatment Stem water potential (ψs)
Season 2015
Field replication (n = 108) Grapevine (n = 324)
Min. Max. Mean SD Min. Max. Mean SD
T0-Full irrigation −1.02 −0.71 −0.88 0.105 −1.35 −0.55 −0.85 0.161
T1-Moderate irrigation −1.29 −0.87 −1.17 0.141 −1.65 −0.65 −1.16 0.235
T2-No irrigation −2.02 −1.29 −1.69 0.245 −2.25 −1.10 −1.67 0.284
Irrigation treatment Season 2016
Grapevine (n = 216)
Min. Max. Mean SD
T0-Full irrigation - - - −1.45 −0.75 −1.08 0.151
T1-Moderate irrigation −1.70 −1.00 −1.30 0.160
T2-No irrigation −1.95 −0.85 −1.36 0.254

Results are shown by vine and averaged by field replicate (an average ψs value was computed from the three individual measurements) for season 2015 and by vine for season 2016.Min, minimum; Max, maximum; SD, standard deviation.