Table 2.
Name of each test, number of participants completing each test, mean z scores and percentage of classification.
| Test Number of children | Sub-test | Mean z score | N (%) | B (%) | D (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiSN-S 27 children | Low-cue | −0.86 | 56% | 33% | 11% |
| High-cue | −1.15 | 44% | 37% | 19% | |
| Talker advantage | −0.94 | 48% | 41% | 11% | |
| Spatial advantage | −1.24 | 52% | 26% | 22% | |
| Total advantage | −0.77 | 59% | 26% | 15% | |
| TEACh 27 children | Sus-AA | −0.86 | 63% | 7% | 30% |
| Div-AA | −0.75 | 59% | 19% | 22% | |
| Sel-VA | −0.71 | 63% | 30% | 7% | |
| Div-AVA | −1.82 | 33% | 15% | 52% | |
| DDT 21 children | Double–right | −1 | 57% | 24% | 19% |
| Double–left | −1.1 | 67% | 4% | 29% | |
| GiN average 18 children | −0.8 | 72% | 11% | 17% | |
| AFG +8 dB 15 children | −1.31 | 53% | 7% | 40% | |
| AFG 0 dB 17 children | −1.8 | 29% | 18% | 53% | |
| FPT 11 children | Triple–right | −0.67 | 55% | 9% | 36% |
| Triple–left | −0.60 | 45% | 18% | 36% |
AFG, Auditory Figure Ground; B, Borderline; D, Disordered; DDT, Dichotic Digits Test; Div-AA, Divided Auditory Attention; Div-AVA, Divided Auditory-Visual Attention; FPT, Frequency Pattern Test; GiN, Gaps-in-Noise; LiSN-S, Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences; N, Normal; Sel-VA, Selective Visual Attention; Sus-AA, Sustained Auditory Attention; TEACh, Test of Every Attention for Children.