Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 31;39(2):335–346. doi: 10.1007/s00246-017-1761-z

Table 2.

Univariable statistical analysis of quantitative data measured in coronary CT angiograms

Compared data p value
Localization of the main coronary arteries in the aortic sinus: gamma angle (Fig. 4 )
LCA RCA p < 0.001
LCA+ (from the LCS) RCA+ (from the RCS) p < 0.001
LCA+ (from the LCS) LAD p = 0.002
RCA+ (from the RCS) RCA + Cx p = 0.001
Branching angle of the coronary arteries along the short axis: alpha angle (Fig. 5 )
LCS RCS p < 0.001
LCA+ (from the LCS) RCA+ (from the RCS) p < 0.001
LCA+ (from the LCS) LAD p = 0.843
RCA+ (from the RCS) RCA + Cx p = 0.202
Branching angle of the coronary arteries along the long axis: beta angle (Fig. 6 )
LCS RCS p < 0.001
LCA+ (from the LCS) RCA+ (from the RCS) p < 0.001
LCA+ (from the LCS) LAD p = 0.281
RCA+ (from the RCS) RCA + Cx p = 0.667
Ellipticity index (height-to-width ratio; Fig. 7 )
LCA or LADa RCA p < 0.001
Position of the coronary arteries in the neoaortic sinus (height; Fig. 8 )
LCS RCS p = 0.002

Significant differences (p value less than 0.05) are italicized

RCA right coronary artery, RCA+ right coronary artery arising from the right coronary sinus, LCA left coronary artery, LCA+ left coronary artery arising from the left coronary sinus, LAD left anterior descending coronary artery, Cx circumflex coronary artery, RCS right coronary sinus, LCS left coronary sinus, n number of measurements, CI confidence interval, SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile range

aIn cases of an absent LCA, measurements of the isolated LAD were taken for the analysis of the height-to-width ratio