Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 31;9:93. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00093

Table 2.

Three types of abundance underestimation based on comparisons among datasets across the four-depth sediments in location S2 for bacterial taxa with higher abundances in MT-16S than 16S rDNA amplicons.

cDNA (%)a rDNA (%)b MT-16S (%)c
mean ± SD mean ± SD mean ± SD
Type I
Phylum
     Acidobacteria 5.36 ± 0.78AB 1.61 ± 1.06C 4.45 ± 0.56A
Order
     Desulfobacterales 7.54 ± 1.53AB 3.24 ± 1.95C 9.33 ± 0.81A
     Myxococcales 1.07 ± 0.10AB 0.28 ± 0.14C 1.17 ± 0.12A
Type II
Phylum
     Elusimicrobia 0.00 ± 0.00B 0.00 ± 0.00BC 1.28 ± 0.67A
     Lentisphaerae 0.00 ± 0.00B 0.00 ± 0.00BC 0.30 ± 0.08A
     Planctomycetes 0.00 ± 0.00B 0.00 ± 0.00BC 3.37 ± 0.59A
     Verrucomicrobia 0.02 ± 0.02B 0.01 ± 0.00BC 3.15 ± 0.18A
Type III
Phylum
     Chloroflexi 11.77 ± 7.29B 5.33 ± 4.62C 20.94 ± 5.89A
Class
Subgroup 22 (Acidobacteria) 0.82 ± 0.14B 0.21 ± 0.09C 1.63 ± 0.33A
Family
     Anaerolineaceae 7.95 ± 5.93B 1.78 ± 1.25C 13.87 ± 4.57A
     Bacteriovoracaceae 0.15 ± 0.03B 0.03 ± 0.02C 0.39 ± 0.11A

Different letters (A, B, C) following the abundances indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05) based on Wilcoxon signed rank test. aAverage proportions in 16S cDNA amplicon datasets for the four-depth sediment samples. bAverage proportions in 16S rDNA amplicon datasets for the four-depth sediment samples. cAverage proportions in MT-16S datasets for the four-depth sediment samples. Supplementary Table S3 provides further details.