Table 1. Number of buffaloes sampled on each farm and estimated within-herd prevalence of F. hepatica on the 29 farms included in the current study.
Governorate | Study population (n) | Number of buffaloes tested (proportion of the study population, %) | Number of buffaloes positive for fecal examination and F. hepatica antibody a) | Within-herd prevalence (%) | 95% confidence interval b) (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alexandria | 85 | 23 (27) | 11 | 12.9 | 5.8–20.1 |
96 | 28 (29) | 10 | 10.4 | 4.3–16.5 | |
110 | 28 (25) | 12 | 10.9 | 5.1–16.7 | |
80 | 28 (35) | 13 | 16.3 | 8.2–24.3 | |
113 | 33 (29) | 18 | 15.9 | 9.2–22.7 | |
125 | 34 (27) | 19 | 15.2 | 8.9–21.5 | |
148 | 35 (24) | 11 | 7.4 | 3.2–11.7 | |
111 | 42 (38) | 13 | 11.7 | 5.7–17.7 | |
133 | 43 (32) | 15 | 11.3 | 5.9–16.7 | |
90 | 45 (50) | 18 | 20.0 | 11.7–28.3 | |
Beheira | 106 | 23 (22) | 15 | 14.2 | 7.5–20.8 |
144 | 26 (18) | 15 | 10.4 | 5.4–15.4 | |
150 | 27 (18) | 17 | 11.3 | 6.3–16.4 | |
133 | 33 (25) | 17 | 12.8 | 7.1–18.5 | |
125 | 33 (26) | 11 | 8.8 | 3.8–13.8 | |
120 | 33 (28) | 14 | 11.7 | 5.9–17.4 | |
98 | 34 (35) | 19 | 19.4 | 11.6–27.2 | |
114 | 40 (35) | 13 | 11.4 | 5.6–17.2 | |
124 | 40 (32) | 20 | 16.1 | 9.7–22.6 | |
120 | 43 (36) | 17 | 14.2 | 7.9–20.4 | |
Kafr el-Sheikh | 100 | 22 (22) | 13 | 13.0 | 6.4–19.6 |
131 | 27 (21) | 16 | 12.2 | 6.6–17.8 | |
107 | 29 (27) | 12 | 11.2 | 5.2–17.2 | |
93 | 31 (33) | 13 | 14.0 | 6.9–21.0 | |
122 | 33 (27) | 16 | 13.1 | 7.1–19.1 | |
118 | 36 (31) | 14 | 11.9 | 6.0–17.7 | |
83 | 41 (49) | 15 | 18.1 | 9.8–26.4 | |
133 | 44 (33) | 16 | 12.0 | 6.5–17.6 | |
144 | 50 (35) | 19 | 13.2 | 7.7–18.7 | |
Total | 3,356 | 984 (29) | 432 | 12.9 | 11.7–14.0 |
a) All the 432 buffaloes positive for Fasciola eggs during the fecal examination were also positive for the F. hepatica antibody during the indirect hemagglutination test. b) The 95% confidence interval of prevalence (Pre) is given by: .