Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 20;80(1):28–35. doi: 10.1292/jvms.17-0282

Table 1. Number of buffaloes sampled on each farm and estimated within-herd prevalence of F. hepatica on the 29 farms included in the current study.

Governorate Study population (n) Number of buffaloes tested (proportion of the study population, %) Number of buffaloes positive for fecal examination and F. hepatica antibody a) Within-herd prevalence (%) 95% confidence interval b) (%)
Alexandria 85 23 (27) 11 12.9 5.8–20.1
96 28 (29) 10 10.4 4.3–16.5
110 28 (25) 12 10.9 5.1–16.7
80 28 (35) 13 16.3 8.2–24.3
113 33 (29) 18 15.9 9.2–22.7
125 34 (27) 19 15.2 8.9–21.5
148 35 (24) 11 7.4 3.2–11.7
111 42 (38) 13 11.7 5.7–17.7
133 43 (32) 15 11.3 5.9–16.7
90 45 (50) 18 20.0 11.7–28.3

Beheira 106 23 (22) 15 14.2 7.5–20.8
144 26 (18) 15 10.4 5.4–15.4
150 27 (18) 17 11.3 6.3–16.4
133 33 (25) 17 12.8 7.1–18.5
125 33 (26) 11 8.8 3.8–13.8
120 33 (28) 14 11.7 5.9–17.4
98 34 (35) 19 19.4 11.6–27.2
114 40 (35) 13 11.4 5.6–17.2
124 40 (32) 20 16.1 9.7–22.6
120 43 (36) 17 14.2 7.9–20.4

Kafr el-Sheikh 100 22 (22) 13 13.0 6.4–19.6
131 27 (21) 16 12.2 6.6–17.8
107 29 (27) 12 11.2 5.2–17.2
93 31 (33) 13 14.0 6.9–21.0
122 33 (27) 16 13.1 7.1–19.1
118 36 (31) 14 11.9 6.0–17.7
83 41 (49) 15 18.1 9.8–26.4
133 44 (33) 16 12.0 6.5–17.6
144 50 (35) 19 13.2 7.7–18.7

Total 3,356 984 (29) 432 12.9 11.7–14.0

a) All the 432 buffaloes positive for Fasciola eggs during the fecal examination were also positive for the F. hepatica antibody during the indirect hemagglutination test. b) The 95% confidence interval of prevalence (Pre) is given by: Inline graphic.