Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 8;293(5):1767–1780. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.809608

Table 4.

Distribution of cleaved embryos recorded at different time points after microinjection of CDC5L antibody into MII oocytes followed by parthenogenetic activation

Control, without microinjection; NC, microinjected negative control; siCDC5L, microinjected CDC5L siRNAs. a-b and A-B indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 levels within the same subcolumns, respectively.

Group No. embryos No. 1-cell No. 2-cell No. 3-cell No. 4-cell No. 5-cell
% ± S.D.
20 h Control 148 88 (59.9 ± 6.5%) 51 (34.3 ± 0.8%) 4 (2.7 ± 1.0%) 0 0
IgG 150 85 (57.2 ± 2.8%) 51 (34.1 ± 5.3%) 8 (5.0 ± 4.4%) 0 0
Anti-CDC5L 140 90 (64.3 ± 2.2%) 32 (22.9 ± 1.1%) 4 (2.9 ± 1.2%) 0 0
26 h Control 147 37 (26.1 ± 10.5%)a 78 (53.4 ± 3.8%)a 13 (8.7 ± 1.1%) 1 (0.6 ± 1.1%) 0
IgG 150 39 (26.2 ± 6.6%)a 79 (52.8 ± 2.6%)a 15 (10.0 ± 0.9%) 3 (2.0 ± 2.0%) 0
Anti-CDC5L 139 55 (39.8 ± 10.8%)b 53 (38.0 ± 3.5%)b 9 (6.5 ± 2.4%) 1 (7.6 ± 1.3%) 0
39 h Control 144 15 (10.8 ± 6.4%) 31 (21.9 ± 8.7%) 40 (28.5 ± 6.5%) 40 (26.8 ± 9.2%)A 7 (4.7 ± 1.8%)
IgG 147 14 (9.7 ± 3.2%) 32 (22.0 ± 6.4%) 41 (27.9 ± 2.4%) 40 (26.9 ± 8.0%)A 6 (4.2 ± 2.4%)
Anti-CDC5L 138 23 (16.7 ± 1.0%) 32 (23.7 ± 12.2) 37 (26.6 ± 7.3%) 18 (12.9 ± 4.9%)B 4 (2.9 ± 2.5%)
48 h Control 144 14 (10.2 ± 7.4%) 31 (21.7 ± 6.7%) 37 (25.7 ± 0.2%) 46 (31.5 ± 4.3%) 10 (6.9 ± 2.7%)
IgG 147 11 (7.7 ± 3.7%) 30 (20.8 ± 8.9%) 38 (15.5 ± 6.1%) 46 (31.2 ± 5.1%) 7 (4.6 ± 2.7%)
Anti-CDC5L 137 20 (14.5 ± 4.5%) 23 (17.1 ± 7.8%) 31 (22.5 ± 5.4%) 32 (23.4 ± 3.0%) 7 (5.0 ± 5.1%)