Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 5.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Radiol. 2017 Jul 10;28(1):340–347. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4951-4

Table 3.

Global network measures, compared for each group. All network measures were calculated using a threshold of 0.0005 (>five total tracts between regions of interest (ROIs)), and using permutation testing to assess significance

Measure MCI-highEF: mean ± SD MCI-lowEF: mean ± SD t: MCI-highEF – MCI-lowEF Permutation t-statistic: mean ± SD p-value
Size 567.47 ± 122.2 541.38 ± 42.9 26.09 1.70 ± 5.5 <0.001
Density 0.134 ± 0.029 0.129 ± 0.010 0.005 −.0016 ± 0.0013 <0.001
Assortativity 0.0508 ± 0.064 0.0586 ± 0.054 −0.0079 −0.004 ± 0.0013 0.3835
Global efficiency 0.4881 ± 0.058 0.4858 ± 0.016 0.0023 −2.9e-4 ± 0.0015 0.09
Clustering coefficient 0.0109 ± 1.9e-4 0.0069 ± 1.7e-4 0.0039 −1.0e-4 ± 1.5e-4 <0.001

The t-statistic (MCI-highEF (mild cognitive impairment with high executive abilities) – MCI-lowEF (cognitive impairment with low executive abilities) is reflected, and the mean of the 10,000 randomly generated t-statistics, with the standard deviation of the population also reflected. The p-value reflects where on the randomly generated t-statistic distribution the measured t-statistic lies

MCI-highEF Individuals with mild cognitive impairment with high executive abilities, MCI-lowEF Individuals with cognitive impairment with low executive abilities, SD standard deviation