Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Invest Dermatol. 2018 Feb;138(2):e13–e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.10.026

Table 1.

Overview of pharmacoepidemiology study designs

Study Design Description Strengths Limitations
Case report/case series A description of a single patient or a series of patients
  • Efficient source for hypothesis generation

  • Cannot rule out chance/bias

  • Unable to determine incidence

  • Observation may not be generalizable to other patients

Cross-sectional study The presence or absence of both exposure and disease are assessed at a single point in time
  • Establish prevalence

  • Hypothesis generation

  • Cannot establish temporal relationship

Ecological or secular trend study A study comparing geographic and/or time trends of illness versus trends in risk factors
  • Rapid and easy support for or against a hypothesis

  • Associations made at the aggregate population level may not apply to individuals

Case crossover study A study comparing the pattern of exposure between an event time and a control time with each patient serving as his/her own control
  • Minimizes confounding by indication

  • Exposure must be transient

  • Outcome must be an acute event that increases sharply and then subsides

  • Recall bias

Case-control study A study that selects patients with the disease of interest (cases) and individuals without the disease of interest (controls). The case and control participants are evaluated for differences in prior exposure to various risk factors, yielding odds ratios as a measure of association.
  • Can study multiple risk factors for a single disease, especially useful for rare diseases

  • Time efficient

  • Bias in measurement of exposure

  • Confounding by indication

Cohort study A study that selects subjects on the basis of the presence (exposed population) or absence (control population) of exposure to a factor of interest. Researchers then follow subjects over time, looking for differences in a variety of outcomes, yielding relative risks as a measure of association.
  • Can study multiple outcomes from an exposure

  • Can measure incidence (risk) of outcome

  • Selection bias

  • Confounding by indication

  • Prolonged duration

  • Costly

Clinical trial The investigator determines which patients receive an exposure and then follows the patients for the outcome.
  • Randomization controls for confounding, selection bias, and confounding by indication.

  • Blinding controls for information bias

  • Criterion standard to establish causality

  • Generalizability

  • Ethical issues

  • Statistical power

  • Costly

  • Prolonged duration