Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Nov;10(11):1625–1633. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000664

TABLE 4.

Multivariate Association with Long-Term Mortality—Interaction with Facility Type, Tumor Size, and Number of Lymph Nodes Examined

Covariates Level Hazard Ratio HR P Value Type 3 P Valuea
Stratified comparisons by facility type 0.035
 Noncomprehensive community cancer program/other Wedge resection (186) vs. lobectomy (440) 1.34 (1.02–1.76)   0.032
Segmental resection (27) vs. lobectomy (440) 2.11 (1.24–3.60)   0.006
 Comprehensive community cancer program Wedge resection (987) vs. lobectomy (2639) 1.47 (1.32–1.64) <0.001
Segmental resection (129) vs. lobectomy (2639) 1.09 (0.82–1.44)   0.561
 Academic/research program Wedge resection (718) vs. lobectomy (1778) 1.73 (1.51–1.98) <0.001
Segmental resection (130) vs. Lobectomy (1778) 1.51 (1.16–1.96)   0.002
Stratified comparisons by tumor size 0.203
 0–1 cm Wedge resection (439) vs. lobectomy (722) 1.77 (1.45–2.16) <0.001
Segmental resection (51) vs. lobectomy (722) 1.24 (0.74–2.06)   0.414
 1–2 cm Wedge resection (1452) vs. lobectomy (4135) 1.47 (1.35–1.61) <0.001
Segmental resection (235) vs. lobectomy (4135) 1.32 (1.09–1.60) 0.004
Stratified comparisons by regional LN examined 0.655
 0–7 Wedge resection (1739) vs. lobectomy (2881) 1.50 (1.37–1.65) <0.001
Segmental resection (246) vs. lobectomy (2881) 1.27 (1.04–1.55) 0.020
 8+ Wedge resection (152) vs. lobectomy (1976) 1.56 (1.21–2.01) <0.001
Segmental resection (40) vs. lobectomy (1976) 1.58 (1.01–2.48) 0.044

Sample size for each subgroup listed in parenthesis.

a

Type 3 P value indicates the significance for the interaction term in the fitted model. LN, lymph nodes.