Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 5;8:2403. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20299-z

Table 3.

Overall effect sizes and results for the categorical moderator analysis.

Category All Measures Compassion
ES 95% CI Fail-Safe Heterogeneity ES 95% CI Fail-Safe Heterogeneity
Main effect 0.26 0.18, 0.34 396 Q 25.71 0.36 0.25, 0.48 181 Q 8.96
Prosocial Type
Compassion 0.37 0.24, 0.49 580 Qb 15.32 N/A
Connectedness 0.22 −0.05, 0.49 Qw 21.38
Empathy 0.44 0.03, 0.84
Aggression 0.11 −0.17, 0.48
Prejudice 0.11 −0.09, 0.30
Measure Type
Questionnaire 0.24 0.13, 0.35 387 Qb 0.40 0.43 0.27, 0.59 221 Qb 3.004
Behavioural 0.29 0.15, 0.43 Qw 24.78 0.27 0.05, 0.49 Qw 7.96
Control Group
Active 0.27 0.12, 0.43 380 Qb 0.08 0.37 −0.04, 0.78 160 Qb 0.006
Passive 0.25 0.14, 0.36 Qw 24.67 0.36 0.20, 0.79 Qw 7.92
Teacher
External/Audio 0.22 0.09, 0.35 394 Qb 0.97 0.26 −0.07, 0.59 214 Qb 2.65
Author 0.30 0.18, 0.41 Qw 24.64 0.42 0.27, 0.57 Qw 7.97
Intervention Duration
One session 0.28 0.07, 0.48 379 Qb 0.06 Fewer than two cases per category available
Multiple sessions 0.25 0.16, 0.35 Qw 24.67

Note: Significant results are highlighted in bold; Mean effect size (ES) reported as Pearson’s r with their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI); Rosenthal’s fail-safe number, and Q heterogeneity statistic; Qb heterogeneity statistics for between-group and Qw for within-group effect size differences. The analysis contained 26 independent samples, exceeding the N of included studies because more than one outcome measure (e.g. compassion and empathy) was used in most studies.