Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 5;8:2344. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19168-6

Table 1.

Summary table for estimated model parameters by fitting 2014 Guangdong cities weekly confirmed dengue data to the Richards model.

City Time interval Growth rate r (95% CI) Case number K (95% CI) Turning point (week)
Guangzhou W33~W44 0.56
(0.51, 0.61)
36,342
(35,753, 36,932)
40
Foshan W25~W50 0.86
(0.73, 0.98)
3550
(3,529, 3,571)
40
Zhongshan W27~W46 0.69
(0.62, 0.76)
673
(666, 679)
40
Jiangmen W34~W48 0.94
(0.47, 1.41)
590
(577, 604)
40
Zhuhai W36~W53 0.94
(0.61, 1.26)
508
(502, 513)
41 (40.06)
Shenzhen W36~W44 1.39
(0.72, 2.06)
385
(367, 403)
41
Qingyuan W33~W53 1.29
(0.57, 2.02)
297
(293, 301)
41
Dongguan W36~W44 1.22
(0.90, 1.55)
267
(262, 273)
40
Zhaoqing W37~W46 2.38
(1.96, 2.80)
275
(274, 276)
41 (40.04)
Chaozhou W38~W53 1.00
(0.34, 1.65)
137
(134, 140)
42
Maoming W37~W48 0.72
(0.40, 1.03)
91
(88, 94)
42
Guangdong W23~W53 0.63
(0.58, 0.68)
44,984
(44,812, 45,157)
40