Table 2.
Comparison with literature data on AAI classifications (Bakermans-Kranenburg and van IJzendoorn, 2009∗; Cassibba et al., 2013∗∗).
| GD (n = 95) | Normative sample∗ (n = 693) | Clinical sample∗ (n = 1854) | Normative sample∗∗ (n = 842) | Clinical sample∗∗ (n = 260) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 26 (27%) | 392 (56%) | 426 (21%) | 508 (60%) | 43 (17%) |
| Ds | 13 (14%) | 112 (16%) | 389 (23%) | 172 (21%) | 79 (30%) |
| E | 12 (13%) | 63 (9%) | 241 (13%) | 92 (11%) | 44 (17%) |
| U/CC | 44 (46%) | 126 (18%) | 797 (43%) | 70 (8%) | 94 (36%) |
| Organized | 51 (54%) | 567 (82%) | 1056 (57%) | 772 (92%) | 166 (64%) |
| Disorganized | 44 (46%) | 126 (18%) | 797 (43%) | 70 (8%) | 94 (36%) |
F, free/autonomous; Ds, dismissing; E, entangled/preoccupied; U, unresolved/disorganized; CC, cannot classify.