Table 6.

Comparison of weighted means for secondary outcomes

Domain		N	Mean (SD)	t	p-value
Rural vs. metropolitan location
Care provider	rural	29	3.39 (1.13)	0.441	0.661
	metro	23	3.24 (1.42)
Consultant	rural	29	3.31 (1.16)	0.468	0.642
	metro	23	3.15 (1.38)
Capacity builder	rural	29	2.99 (1.12)	0.286	0.776
	metro	23	2.90 (1.23)
Clinical trainer	rural	29	3.27 (1.19)	0.183	0.856
	metro	23	3.20 (1.46)
Clinical governance leader	rural	28	3.17 (1.30)	0.365	0.717
	metro	23	3.04 (1.29)
Champion of community-orientated primary care	rural	29	3.31 (1.18)	0.289	0.774
	metro	23	3.21 (1.45)
DHS facility type
Care provider	CHC	25	3.27 (1.14)	− 0.285	0.777
	DH	27	3.37 (1.38)
Consultant	CHC	25	3.22 (1.12)	− 0.129	0.898
	DH	27	3.26 (1.38)
Capacity builder	CHC	25	2.97 (1.04)	0.096	0.924
	DH	27	2.94 (1.28)
Clinical trainer	CHC	25	3.26 (1.15)	0.109	0.914
	DH	27	3.22 (1.45)
Clinical governance leader	CHC	24	3.26 (1.18)	0.776	0.441
	DH	27	2.98 (1.38)
Champion of community-orientated primary care	CHC	25	3.27 (1.15)	0.043	0.965
	DH	27	3.26 (1.44)
New vs. previous training model
Care provider	new	23	3.27 (1.23)	− 0.284	0.778
	previous	29	3.37 (1.30)
Consultant	new	23	3.11 (1.22)	− 0.650	0.519
	previous	29	3.34 (1.29)
Capacity builder	new	23	2.74 (1.10)	−1.208	0.233
	previous	29	3.13 (1.19)
Clinical trainer	new	23	3.07 (1.27)	− 0.842	0.404
	previous	29	3.37 (1.33)
Clinical governance leader	new	22	2.77 (1.17)	− 1.664	0.102
	previous	29	3.37 (1.33)
Champion of community-orientated primary care	new	23	3.08 (1.24)	− 0.914	0.365
	previous	29	3.41 (1.34)

*significant at p < 0.05