Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 5;19:33. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2039-z

Table 7.

Intrinsic (left 5 columns) and extrinsic scores (right 4 columns) of the biomedical representation models trained using different window sizes

Window Size UMN-rel(ρ) UMN-sim(ρ) MayoSRS (ρ) Bio-SimVerb(ρ) Bio-SimLex(ρ) BC4CHECMD (F-score) BC2GM (F-score) AnatEM (F-score) JNLPBA (F-score)
1 0.5317 0.5759 0.5551 0.4594 0.7294 81.51 70.06 82.16 65.34
2 0.563 0.6144 0.6238 0.4696 0.7207 81.44 70 82.21 65.51
4 0.5768 0.6247 0.581 0.464 0.7188 81.5 70.04 82 65.75
5 0.5767 0.6271 0.5744 0.4638 0.7151 81.37 70.20 81.32 65.16
8 0.582 0.6377 0.5975 0.4611 0.7086 81.24 69.56 80.99 65.53
16 0.5888 0.6431 0.6123 0.4667 0.7034 81.02 69.39 80.72 64.78
20 0.5896 0.6418 0.6319 0.4584 0.7031 81.12 69.62 80.49 65.19
25 0.6018 0.6489 0.6188 0.4519 0.7004 81.07 69.93 80.92 65.14
30 0.6007 0.6457 0.6486 0.4502 0.7043 80.71 69.2 81.03 64.79

The bolded text implies the best performing models of their kind