Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 5;16:4. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0280-6

Table 5.

Ranked context-specific issues

Rank Context-specific issue Score Frequency in first rank
1 Economic evaluations not included as a part of the decision-making process 26 39%
2 Limited local capacity to conduct or contextualise research 19 29%
3 Lack of funding for the necessary research 10 15%a
4 Misunderstandings and communications weaknesses between researchers, academia and end-users of the evidence 10 15%
5 Absence of local journal with a high-quality reviewing processes 1 2%

aThe rank takes account of frequencies in the regional analysis