Table 1.
QTL analysis of salt tolerance rating (STR) and leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD) values for RIL derived from ‘Jidou 12’ × ’Ji NF 58’ using different mapping method
| Trait | Method | Nearest marker | Position (cM) | LOD | R2(%)a | Additiveb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STR | SMR | Sat_091 | 38.3 | 19.8 | 44.3 | 0.876 |
| CIM | Sat_091 | 38.3 | 19.8 | 44.3 | 0.877 | |
| MIM | Sat_091 | 38.3 | 20.1 | 44.7 | 0.885 | |
| SPAD | SMR | Sat_091 | 38.3 | 10.7 | 27.0 | 1.634 |
| CIM | Sat_091 | 38.3 | 10.7 | 27.0 | 1.636 | |
| MIM | Satt237/Satt255 | 35.5 | 11.0 | 27.6 | 1.679 |
SMR single-marker regression, CIM composite interval mapping, MIM multiple interval mapping
aR2 was the percentage of the phenotype variance explained by the QTL
bThe estimated additive effect of the alleles of ‘Jidou 12’