Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mindfulness (N Y). 2017 Jul 13;9(1):199–211. doi: 10.1007/s12671-017-0763-5

Table 1.

Correlations and descriptive statistics of all study variables among meditation experienced students (below diagonal) and meditation-naïve students

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 M SD
1. Observing .27 .83 .13 .15 .28 .35 .23 .21 3.15 0.80
2. Describing .78 .06 .88 .28 .16 .36 .27 .27 3.36 0.78
3. Acting with Awareness .73 −.17 .51 .88 .45 .06 .00 .07 3.42 0.80
4. Non-judging .53 .41 .27 .56 .88 .04 −.10 .01 3.40 0.85
5. Non-reactivity .52 .41 .32 .07 −.13 .78 .26 .25 2.94 0.72
6. State Mindfulness-Mind .29 .29 .27 .04 .26 .42 .94 .72 45.77 12.82
7. State Mindfulness-Body .23 .23 .21 .05 .21 .21 .77 .88 16.98 5.58
M 3.28 3.55 3.33 3.37 3.14 2.99 50.02 19.36
SD 0.48 0.80 0.89 0.83 0.94 0.74 13.36 6.32

Note. Significant correlations (p < .05) are bolded for emphasis. Cronbach’s alphas are underlined and shown on the diagonals. Correlations for meditation experienced students (n = 93) are below the diagonal. Correlations for meditation-naïve students (n = 206) are above the diagonal. Independent t-test found significant mean differences between meditation experienced and meditation-naïve students on observing (higher for meditation experienced), non-judging (higher for meditation-naïve), state mindfulness of body (higher for meditation experienced), and state mindfulness of mind (higher for meditation experienced).