Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2017 Jul 18;199(1):53–59. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.07.042

Table 2.

Logistic regression model of factors associated with lymphadenectomy

OR Point Estimate (95% Wald CI) p Value (chi-square)
Age 0.98 (0.97–0.99)   0.001
Institution type (vs academic):
 CCOP 0.61 (0.48–0.79) <0.0001
 Affiliate 0.74 (0.59–0.95)   0.02
Primary nephrectomy (radical vs partial) 2.48 (1.41–4.36)   0.002
AJCC stage:
 2 vs 1 2.05 (1.24–3.38)   0.005
 3 vs 1 2.91 (1.81–4.69) <0.0001
 4 vs 1 1.83 (0.68–4.92)   0.23
Surgical method (open vs laparoscopic) 2.61 (2.11–3.24) <0.0001
Side involved (vs lt):
 Rt 0.74 (0.60–0.91)   0.004
 Bilat 2.26 (0.18–27.75)   0.52
Adrenalectomy (vs no adrenalectomy):
 Yes (partial) 2.82 (2.26–3.52) <0.0001
 Yes (full) 1.73 (1.19–2.50)   0.004
 Missing 1.92 (0.93–3.99)   0.08
Sarcomatoid features (yes vs no) 1.99 (1.40–2.81) <0.0001