Table 2.
S. no | Fusion protein | BoPPD | AvPPD | Interpretation | Number of reactive sera/total TB negative cattle sera | Conclusion based on the LFA kit |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Positive line | Positive line | Positive line | TB sero-positive | – | TB sero-positive (10 out of 100 samples) |
2 | Positive line | Positive line | Negative line | 1 out 100 | ||
3 | Negative line | Positive line | Negative line | 3 out 100 | ||
4 | Positive line | Negative line | Negative line | 3 out 100 | ||
5 | Positive line | Negative line | Positive line | 2 out 100 | ||
6 | Negative line | Positive line | Positive line | TB sero-positive/Inconclusive | 1 out 100 | |
7 | Negative line | Negative line | Positive line | TB sero-negative (positive for environmental mycobacteria) | 6 out of 100 | TB sero-negative (90 out 100 samples) |
8 | Negative line | Negative line | Negative line | TB sero-negative | 84 out of 100 |
The sera samples (n = 100) were from cattle which turned negative in skin test and IGRA. The estimated specificity of the LFA kit was 90% (82.38–95.10% at 95% CI) in cattle