Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2017 Oct 12;114:58–71. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2017.10.004

Table 1. Blockade degree (% Control) of the ICa and different calcium measurements.

(global and focal cytosolic Ca2+ transients ([Ca2+]T) measured using Fluo-4 AM for global, GCaMP6-FKBP for the focal RyR2 microdomains, and mito-GCaMP6 targeted to mitochondrial matrix to monitor its Ca2+ profiles) between both cell types (rapidly and slowly inactivating ICa cells) for the two different treatments (acidosis and hypoxia). Rapidly and slowly inactivating ICa cell plots (columns) were compared for interventions, acidosis and hypoxia (rows), using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Non-significant differences (n.s.) or significant differences between both cell types (in the columns on the right): Data are means ± SE of the number of cells n and number of cultures N shown in parentheses.

Treatment Rapidly Slowly
Ica [Ca2+]T ICa [Ca2+]T
       
GCaMP6-FKBP (Focal RyR2 μ-domains)
Acidosis 26.5 ± 6.1 (4, 4) 36.8 ± 4.8 (4, 4) 28.3 ± 7.5 (3, 3) n.s. 38.5 ± 7.5 (3, 3) n.s.
Hypoxia 15.8 ± 4.7 (4, 4) 26.5 ± 6.3 (4, 4) 34.7± 5.3 (5, 4)* 42.0 ± 9.1 (5, 4) n.s.
Fluo-4 AM (Global cytosolic calcium transients)
Acidosis 32.5 ± 7.2 (5, 4) 22.8 ± 1.6 (5, 4) 31.8 ± 8.1 (4, 4) n.s. 19.6 ± 2.5 (4, 4) n.s.
Hypoxia 23.9 ± 6.7 (5, 4) 17.1 ± 1.7 (5, 4) 42.1± 7.7 (4, 4)* 21.2 ± 3.1 (4, 4) n.s.
GCaMP6-Cytochrome Probe (Mitochondria calcium uptake)
Acidosis 29.0 ± 5.7 (3, 3) 15.6 ± 5.0 (3, 3) 30.9 ± 6.2 (3, 3) n.s. 5.9 ± 6.2 (3, 3) n.s.
Hypoxia 18.1 ± 4.5 (3, 2) 31.9 ± 4.7 (3, 2) 34.1 ± 3.6 (4, 3)* 41.1 ± 6.6 (4, 3) n.s.
*

P < 0.05, Mann-Whitney rank-sum test.