Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 2;6:13. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00013

Table 3.

Overall model of impact on the mortality rate of different campaigns with oral polio vaccine (OPV).

Variable Campaign OPV(1) MRR p-value Campaign OPV(2) MRR p-value Campaign OPV(3) MRR p-value
Campaign-OPV 0.81 (0.68–0.95) 0.011 0.87 (0.79–0.96) 0.007 0.77 (0.56–1.08)m 0.13
0.80 (0.57–1.12)b 0.20
0.85 (0.71–1.02)t 0.09
Campaign-OPV + VASa 1.10 (0.82–1.48) 0.53 1.06 (0.79–1.41) 0.70 1.08 (0.81–1.44) 0.61
Campaign-VASa 1.04 (0.80–1.35) 0.76 1.05 (0.81–1.36) 0.72 1.03 (0.80–1.34) 0.81
Campaign-H1N1a 1.86 (1.02–3.42) 0.04 2.10 (1.13–3.92) 0.02 1.90 (0.98–3.70) 0.06
Campaign-MVa 1.24 (0.74–2.09) 0.42 1.26 (0.74–2.12) 0.39 1.21 (0.72–2.04) 0.48
Calendar year, 0–5 monthsb 0.95 (0.93–0.98) 0.001 0.95 (0.93–0.98) <0.001 0.96 (0.93–0.98) 0.001
Calendar year, 6–11 monthsb 0.89 (0.85–0.94) <0.001 0.89 (0.85–0.94) <0.001 0.90 (0.85–0.95) <0.001
Calendar year, >12 monthsb 0.83 (0.73–0.94) 0.004 0.83 (0.73–0.94) 0.004 0.84 (0.73–0.96) 0.01

aafter-campaign vs before campaign.

bCalendar year trend in the age-groups of 0–5, 6–11, and >12 months of age.

(1)After-campaign vs before campaign.

(2)Continuous dose-response for OPV.

(3)After-campaign vs before campaign; OPV-type: monovalentm, bivalentb, trivalentt..