Table 1.
Study title | Age span (years) | Quality of life (selection of indicators) | Methodology | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Berlin Aging Study (BASE I) | 70+ | Broad range of objective and subjective indicators | N = 516 (intensive protocol), random sample of West-Berlin residents, stratified by age and gender (1990/93) | [15] |
Generali Hochaltrigenstudie (Interview study) |
85–99 | Themes of life (Daseinsthemen) | N = 400 In-depth biographical interviews, ad hoc sample (2013) | [7] |
Heidelberg Centenarian Study I | 100 | Four aspects of quality of life: cognitive status, functional capacity, mental health, subjective well-being | N = 91, Local random sample (2000/01) | [25] |
Heidelberg Centenarian Study II | 100 | Life satisfaction, meaning in life | N = 112, Local random sample (n = 95) (2011/13) | [12] |
Austrian Interdisciplinary Study on the Oldest Old (ÖIHS) | 80–85 | Objective indicators: e. g. health, care, standard of living (quantitative study part); subjective indicators: e. g. life satisfaction, opinions (qualitative study part) | N = 410, Styria (150) and Vienna (260), local random sample; 40 qualitative interviews; (2013/14) | [27] |
Quality of Life in the Elderly – Standardization of the WHOQOL-OLD | 60+ | Subjective quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF), six facets of the WHOQOL-OLD | N = 1133, German random sample, additional sample 80+ (N = 309) (2012) | [3, 4] |
Enabling Autonomy, Participation, and Well-Being in Old Age: The Home Environment as a Determinant for Healthy Aging (EnableAge) | 80–89 | Home environment and housing, objective and subjective health, life satisfaction, affect | N = 450, German local random sub-sample (2002) | [9] |
Longitudinal Analysis of Subjective Well-being in Very Old Age (LateLine) | 87–97 | Hedonic well-being (e. g. life satisfaction, affect), eudaemonic well-being (e. g. autonomy, purpose in life), mental distress | N = 124 (Baseline), German EnableAge follow up, seven measurement occasions from 2009/13 | [31] |