Table 1.
Factors | Professional forum, mean (SD) | Advisory forum, mean (SD) | Total, mean (SD) | ||
Trustworthiness of experts | |||||
METIa score | |||||
High MTJb | 3.16 (0.63) | 3.42 (0.50) | 3.30 (0.58) | ||
Low MTJ | 3.26 (0.63) | 3.41 (0.64) | 3.34 (0.63) | ||
Total | 3.21 (0.63) | 3.42 (0.57) | 3.31 (0.60) | ||
Expertise | |||||
High MTJ | 2.71 (0.81) | 2.92 (0.78) | 2.82 (0.80) | ||
Low MTJ | 3.12 (0.79) | 3.26 (0.79) | 3.19 (0.79) | ||
Total | 2.91 (0.80) | 3.11 (0.79) | 3.01 (0.79) | ||
Integrity | |||||
High MTJ | 3.44 (0.62) | 3.70 (0.46) | 3.58 (0.55) | ||
Low MTJ | 3.34 (0.63) | 3.49 (0.60) | 3.42 (0.62) | ||
Total | 3.39 (0.63) | 3.59 (0.53) | 3.49 (0.58) | ||
Benevolence | |||||
High MTJ | 3.48 (0.63) | 3.83 (0.45) | 3.66 (0.57) | ||
Low MTJ | 3.38 (0.68) | 3.56 (0.67) | 3.47 (0.67) | ||
Total | 3.43 (0.65) | 3.70 (0.56) | 3.56 (0.61) | ||
Credibility of information | |||||
High MTJ | 3.05 (0.38) | 2.90 (0.44) | 2.97 (0.42) | ||
Low MTJ | 2.97 (0.47) | 3.00 (0.60) | 2.99 (0.54) | ||
Total | 3.01 (0.42) | 2.95 (0.52) | 2.98 (0.47) | ||
Perceived accommodation by experts | |||||
ROSc score | |||||
High MTJ | 2.79 (0.42) | 2.62 (0.49) | 2.70 (0.46) | ||
Low MTJ | 3.51 (0.46) | 3.48 (0.44) | 3.49 (0.45) | ||
Total | 3.15 (0.44) | 3.05 (0.47) | 3.10 (0.45) | ||
Audience design | |||||
High MTJ | 2.58 (0.46) | 2.43 (0.53) | 2.51 (0.49) | ||
Low MTJ | 3.43 (0.45) | 3.49 (0.42) | 3.46 (0.43) | ||
Total | 3.01 (0.45) | 2.96 (0.48) | 2.98 (0.47) | ||
Subjective comprehension | |||||
High MTJ | 3.25 (0.64) | 3.10 (0.64) | 3.17 (0.64) | ||
Low MTJ | 3.80 (0.55) | 3.70 (0.55) | 3.75 (0.55) | ||
Total | 3.52 (0.60) | 3.40 (0.60) | 5.16 (0.60) | ||
Emotional evaluation | |||||
High MTJ | 2.76 (0.49) | 2.54 (0.57) | 2.64 (0.52) | ||
Low MTJ | 3.41 (0.55) | 3.30 (0.60) | 3.35 (0.58) | ||
Total | 3.10 (0.52) | 2.92 (0.58) | 6.00 (0.55) |
aMETI: Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory.
bMTJ: medical technical jargon.
cROS: recipient orientation scale.