Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 23;20(1):e30. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8346

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics.

Factors Professional forum, mean (SD) Advisory forum, mean (SD) Total, mean (SD)
Trustworthiness of experts



METIa score




High MTJb 3.16 (0.63) 3.42 (0.50) 3.30 (0.58)
Low MTJ 3.26 (0.63) 3.41 (0.64) 3.34 (0.63)
Total 3.21 (0.63) 3.42 (0.57) 3.31 (0.60)
Expertise



High MTJ 2.71 (0.81) 2.92 (0.78) 2.82 (0.80)
Low MTJ 3.12 (0.79) 3.26 (0.79) 3.19 (0.79)
Total 2.91 (0.80) 3.11 (0.79) 3.01 (0.79)
Integrity



High MTJ 3.44 (0.62) 3.70 (0.46) 3.58 (0.55)
Low MTJ 3.34 (0.63) 3.49 (0.60) 3.42 (0.62)
Total 3.39 (0.63) 3.59 (0.53) 3.49 (0.58)
Benevolence



High MTJ 3.48 (0.63) 3.83 (0.45) 3.66 (0.57)
Low MTJ 3.38 (0.68) 3.56 (0.67) 3.47 (0.67)
Total 3.43 (0.65) 3.70 (0.56) 3.56 (0.61)
Credibility of information




High MTJ 3.05 (0.38) 2.90 (0.44) 2.97 (0.42)
Low MTJ 2.97 (0.47) 3.00 (0.60) 2.99 (0.54)
Total 3.01 (0.42) 2.95 (0.52) 2.98 (0.47)
Perceived accommodation by experts



ROSc score




High MTJ 2.79 (0.42) 2.62 (0.49) 2.70 (0.46)
Low MTJ 3.51 (0.46) 3.48 (0.44) 3.49 (0.45)
Total 3.15 (0.44) 3.05 (0.47) 3.10 (0.45)
Audience design



High MTJ 2.58 (0.46) 2.43 (0.53) 2.51 (0.49)
Low MTJ 3.43 (0.45) 3.49 (0.42) 3.46 (0.43)
Total 3.01 (0.45) 2.96 (0.48) 2.98 (0.47)
Subjective comprehension



High MTJ 3.25 (0.64) 3.10 (0.64) 3.17 (0.64)
Low MTJ 3.80 (0.55) 3.70 (0.55) 3.75 (0.55)
Total 3.52 (0.60) 3.40 (0.60) 5.16 (0.60)
Emotional evaluation



High MTJ 2.76 (0.49) 2.54 (0.57) 2.64 (0.52)
Low MTJ 3.41 (0.55) 3.30 (0.60) 3.35 (0.58)
Total 3.10 (0.52) 2.92 (0.58) 6.00 (0.55)

aMETI: Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory.

bMTJ: medical technical jargon.

cROS: recipient orientation scale.