Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 7.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Hematol. 2015 Oct 6;90(11):981–985. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24131

Table 1.

Distribution of chemotherapy regimens

Induction regimen Number of patients, n = 816
IMiD 489 (59.9%)
 Lenalidomide dexamethasone 382
 Lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone 38
 Thalidomide, melphalan, prednisone 21
 Lenalidomide, melphalan, prednisone 20
 Thalidomide dexamethasone 20
 Lenalidomide 6
 Pomalidomide dexamethasone 1
 Lenalidomide bendamustine 1
PI 185 (22.6%)
 Bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone 110
 Bortezomib dexamethasone 63
 Bortezomib, doxorubicin, dexamethasone 4
 Bortezomib, melphalan, prednisone 3
 Bortezomib 2
 Ixazomib, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone 2
 Bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, prednisone 1
IMiD and PI 80 (9.8%)
 Bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone 59
 Bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone 8
 Carfilzomib, thalidomide, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone 5
 VDT-PACE 3
 Ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone 3
 Bortezomib, lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone 1
 Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone 1
No novel agent 62 (7.6%)
 Dexamethasone 31
 Melphalan prednisone 26
 Melphalan dexamethasone 2
 Cyclophosphamide prednisone 1
 Cyclophosphamide dexamethasone 1
 Prednisone 1

IMiD indicates immunomodulatory drug; PI, proteosome inhibitor; and VDT-PACE, bortezomib, dexamethasone, lenalidomide, cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide