Table 1. Genetic diversity indices, based on 11 microsatellite loci, of lions in the Savé Valley Conservancy (SVC), Bubye Valley Conservancy (BVC) and Gonarezhou National Park (GNP) in Zimbabwe.
Data from other lion populations in Africa are added for comparisons; these were Ngorongoro Crater (NGR; Tanzania), Serengeti National Park (SER; Tanzania), Etosha National Park (ETO, Namibia); Kruger National Park (KRU, South Africa) [46], Pendjari National Park (PEN; Benin); Waza National Park (WAZ; Cameroon), Bénoué Ecosystem (BEN; Cameroon), Zakouma National Park (ZAK; Chad), Garamba National Park (GAR; DRC), Amboseli National Park (AMB; Kenya), Luangwa Valley (LUA; Zambia), Kalahari-Gemsbok National Park (GEM; South Africa), Kruger National Park (KGR; South Africa) [47].
Population | NS | NL | A | AP | HO | HE | FIS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVC | 25 | 11 | 3.5 (±1.1) | 0.45 | 0.38 (±0.2) | 0.41 (±0.2) | 0.171 |
BVC | 7 | 11 | 3.7 (±1.2) | 0.63 | 0.53 (±0.2) | 0.66 (±0.1) | 0.208 |
GNP | 10 | 11 | 3.7 (±1.1) | 1.25 | 0.57 (±0.3) | 0.53 (±0.2) | -0.085 |
NGC | 10 | 88 | 2.9 | - | 0.43 | 0.40 | - |
SER | 10 | 88 | 3.5 | - | 0.47 | 0.47 | - |
ETO | 10 | 77 | 2.6 | - | 0.38 | 0.37 | - |
KRU | 10 | 77 | 3.4 | - | 0.47 | 0.44 | - |
PEN | 5 | 20 | 3.0 | 0.05 | 0.65 | 0.55 | -0.204 |
WAZ | 9 | 20 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0.68 | 0.61 | -0.129 |
BEN | 3 | 20 | 2.9 | 0.05 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.060 |
ZAK | 4 | 15 | 2.6 | 0.20 | 0.6 | 0.56 | 0.085 |
GAR | 7 | 20 | 4.7 | 0.10 | 0.74 | 0.7 | -0.066 |
AMB | 7 | 20 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0.51 | 0.5 | -0.025 |
LUA | 9 | 20 | 4.8 | 0.15 | 0.57 | 0.69 | 0.182 |
GEM | 10 | 20 | 4.0 | 0.05 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.082 |
KGR | 10 | 20 | 4.6 | 0.25 | 0.69 | 0.69 | -0.002 |
NS = sample size; NL = number of microsatellite loci; A = average number of alleles per locus
AP = private allelic richness; HO = observed heterozygosity; HE = expected heterozygosity; FIS =
inbreeding coefficient;—indicates data not available.