Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 7;6(2):E249–E253. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-124364

Table 1. Characteristics and therapeutic results for the enrolled patients.

Patient Age Sex Tumor location Procedure time, min Size of resected specimen/tumor, mm Macroscopic classification Pathological diagnosis R0/Curative resection Adverse events
 1 58 F Sigmoid colon 20 34/27 LST-NG Category 4 Yes/Yes None
 2 41 M Cecum 15 32/25 LST-NG Category 3 Yes/Yes Delayed bleeding
 3 58 M Ascending colon 19 25/20 LST-NG Category 3 Yes/Yes None
 4 52 M Transverse colon  8 30/28 LST-G Category 3 Yes/Yes None
 5 62 M Descending colon 20 30/30 LST-NG Category 4 Yes/Yes None
 6 68 M Rectum 25 40/32 LST-G Category 4 Yes/Yes None
 7 70 M Ascending colon 16 25/24 LST-NG Category 4 Yes/Yes None
 8 54 M Cecum 12 35/25 LST-NG Category 3 Yes/Yes None
 9 52 F Sigmoid colon 15 28/26 LST-NG Category 4 Yes/Yes None
10 61 M Cecum 11 26/22 LST-G Category 3 Yes/Yes None

Abbreviations: LST-G, granular-type laterally spreading tumor; LST-NG, non-granular-type laterally spreading tumor.

NOTE: The pathological examination was performed using the Vienna classification 4 . Category 3 corresponds to low grade adenoma. Category 4 included both high grade adenoma and non-invasive carcinoma. R0 resection was defined as a complete resection with negative lateral and vertical margins when examined pathologically. Curative resection was achieved when both the lateral and vertical margins of the specimen were free of carcinoma and no findings of submucosal deep invasion (> 1000 μm) from the muscularis mucosae, lymphatic invasion, vascular involvement or poorly differentiated component were present.