Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 6.
Published in final edited form as: Structure. 2018 Jan 18;26(2):270–281.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2017.12.012

Table 1.

Crystallographic data collection and refinement statistics

Data Collection
Beamline ALS 8.3.1
Wavelength (Å) 1.11
Space group P 21 21 21
Cell dimensions
 a, b, c (Å) 48.1, 78.0, 106.2
 α, β, γ (°) 90.0, 90.0, 90.0
Resolution (Å) 63 – 2.4 (2.45 – 2.4)a
Rmergeb (%) 10.3 (89.0)
<I>/<σ>c 10.8 (1.1)
Completeness (%) 98.8 (98.5)
Refinement
No. of reflections 16,260
Rworkc (%) 21.5
Rfreed (%) 24.7
No. of atoms
 Protein 2441
 Ligand/ion 32
 Water 11
RMSD
 Bond lengths (Å) 0.002
 Bond angle (°) 0.45
Ramachandran plot (%)
 Favored 97.0
 Allowed 3.0
 Outliers 0.0
a

Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.

b

Rmerge= Σhkl Σj | I j − 〈 I 〉 |/Σhkl ΣIj, where j is the jth measurement and <I> is the weighted mean of I.

c

<I>/<σ> is the mean intensity divided by the mean error.

d

Rwork= Σhkl || Fo | − k | Fc ||/Σhkl | Fo |, where Fo and Fc are the observed and calculated structure factor amplitudes, and k is a weighting factor.

e

Rfree is the same as Rwork calculated on 5% of the reflections.