Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2017 Dec 28;63:31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2017.12.003

Table 2.

Segmentation Comparison for Healthy Subjects (N=80 bones)

WRIST vs. Observer 1 WRIST vs. Observer 2 Observer 1 vs. Observer 2
Bone Dice Jaccard Hausdorff Dice Jaccard Hausdorff Dice Jaccard Hausdorff
Scaphoid 93.7 ± 4.9 88.4 ± 8.1 3.6 ± 3.8 93.7 ± 5.0 88.6 ± 8.3 3.6 ± 3.8 98.0 ± 1.4 96.0 ± 2.6 0.9 ± 0.3
Lunate 93.7 ± 2.8 88.4 ± 5.0 1.4 ± 0.8 93.8 ± 3.4 88.5 ± 6.0 1.5 ± 0.9 97.6 ± 1.4 95.4 ± 2.7 0.9 ± 0.3
Triquetrum 93.3 ± 3.6 88.9 ± 4.3 3.1 ± 5.8 93.2 ± 3.7 88.8 ± 4.5 3.0 ± 5.9 97.6 ± 1.5 95.3 ± 2.8 1.3 ± 0.5
Pisiform 91.4 ± 3.7 84.3 ± 6.2 1.2 ± 0.5 91.1 ± 3.6 83.9 ± 6.1 1.4 ± 0.6 96.3 ± 2.4 93.0 ± 4.4 1.1 ± 0.6
Trapezium 93.1 ± 2.6 87.1 ± 4.5 2.3 ± 0.4 92.6 ± 2.9 86.3 ± 4.8 2.3 ± 0.6 96.4 ± 2.6 93.1 ± 4.7 1.7 ± 0.8
Trapezoid 92.1 ± 3.5 85.5 ± 5.9 1.9 ± 0.6 92.0 ± 3.9 85.3 ± 6.4 1.9 ± 0.5 96.2 ± 2.3 92.6 ± 4.1 1.5 ± 0.6
Capitate 94.5 ± 2.0 90.3 ± 3.0 2.8 ± 2.7 94.5 ± 2.6 90.3 ± 4.0 2.6 ± 2.9 97.3 ± 1.4 94.8 ± 2.6 1.8 ± 0.8
Hamate 92.1 ± 4.3 85.6 ± 7.2 5.1 ± 4.8 92.2 ± 4.1 85.7 ± 7.0 5.3 ± 4.7 96.9 ± 1.6 94.0 ± 3.0 1.9 ± 0.8
Overall 93.0 ± 3.7 87.3 ± 6.0 2.7 ± 3.4 92.9 ± 3.9 87.2 ± 6.4 2.7 ± 3.4 97.1 ± 2.0 94.3 ± 3.7 1.4 ± 0.7