Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2017 Dec 28;63:31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2017.12.003

Table 3.

Segmentation Comparison for OA Subjects (N=32 bones)

WRIST vs. Observer 1 WRIST vs. Observer 2 Observer 1 vs. Observer 2
Bone Dice Jaccard Hausdorff Dice Jaccard Hausdorff Dice Jaccard Hausdorff
Scaphoid 92.7 ± 3.5 86.4 ± 6.1 3.7 ± 1.3 92.1 ± 3.7 85.3 ± 6.2 3.6 ± 1.3 97.8 ± 1.4 95.7 ± 2.6 1.3 ± 0.2
Lunate 93.4 ± 4.3 87.7 ± 7.0 3.4 ± 6.7 91.9 ± 4.6 87.1 ± 8.0 3.4 ± 6.7 97.4 ± 1.6 94.8 ± 2.9 1.0 ± 0.2
Triquetrum 93.9 ± 11.3 88.4 ± 10.1 1.8 ± 1.1 93.1 ± 9.4 87.2 ± 9.5 1.6 ± 1.3 96.9 ± 3.2 94.0 ± 5.7 1.2 ± 0.4
Pisiform 92.2 ± 7.3 85.7 ± 11.2 1.4 ± 0.1 92.2 ± 7.3 85.6 ± 9.7 1.4 ± 1.3 96.0 ± 3.6 92.3 ± 6.3 0.9 ± 0.2
Trapezium 80.5 ± 10.5 63.2 ± 5.0 6.1 ± 0.9 77.7 ± 8.6 61.8 ± 6.9 6.1 ± 1.2 84.5 ± 2.6 72.7 ± 4.1 3.1 ± 1.8
Trapezoid 91.5 ± 2.9 84.3 ± 5.0 2.6 ± 0.9 90.1 ± 4.8 82.1 ± 7.5 2.5 ± 1.0 96.2 ± 3.8 92.7 ± 6.5 1.2 ± 0.3
Capitate 93.0 ± 4.2 86.9 ± 6.7 3.9 ± 2.8 92.8 ± 5.4 86.7 ± 8.5 4.2 ± 2.9 96.8 ± 1.9 93.9 ± 3.5 1.6 ± 0.3
Hamate 92.7 ± 6.7 86.1 ± 5.4 9.0 ± 6.6 92.0 ± 6.8 85.3 ± 7.1 8.5 ± 6.9 96.8 ± 2.3 93.8 ± 2.3 2.0 ± 0.5
Overall 91.2 ± 8.6 83.6 ± 10.3 4.0 ± 4.4 90.2 ± 8.5 82.6 ± 10.8 3.9 ± 4.4 95.3 ± 4.6 91.2 ± 7.8 1.5 ± 1.1