Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 6;97(3):330–337. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20160298

Table 2.

Results of Analyses Comparing Outcomes Between Treatment Groups Subgrouped by Risk Stratificationa

Measure Medium-Risk Group High-Risk Group
Early 
Intervention Group Usual Care Group Mean 
Within-Group Difference 
(95% CI) Early 
Intervention Group Usual Care Group Mean 
Within-Group 
Difference (95% CI) Mean 
Interaction 
Effect 
(95% CI)
Oswestry Disability Indexb
Baseline 44.0 38.2 45.4 47.2
4 wk 10.3 12.8 –2.44 (–7.03 to 2.15) 13.6 17.5 –3,88 (–10.39 to 2.63) –1.44 (–9.40 to 6.52)
P=.29 P=.24 P=.72
3 mo 6.6 8.5 –2.00 (–5.85 to 1.85) 6.1 12.0 –5.87 (–11.24 to –0.50) –3.87 (–10.50 to 2.75)
P=.30 P=.03c P=.25
1 y 6.9 9.5 –2.63 (–6.95 to 1.68) 7.1 9.5 –2.36 (–8.33 to 3.61) –0.26 (–7.11 to 7.70)
P=.23 P=.43 P=.94
Numeric Pain Rating Scaled
Baseline 5.2 4.7 6.3 6.1
4 wk 1.6 1.9 –0.30 (–0.91 to 0.31) 1.6 2.5 –0.87 (–1.75 to –0.01) –0.57 (–1.63 to 0.52)
P=.34 P=.05c P=.89
3 mo 1.3 1.6 –0.38 (–0.97 to 0.21) 1.3 2.3 –0.98 (–1.81 to –0.14) –0.60 (–1.61 to 0.41)
P=.20 P=.02c P=.25
1 y 1.0 1.4 –0.33 (–0.91 to 0.25) 1.0 1.8 –0.74 (–1.56 to 0.08) –0.41 (–1.41 to 0.58)
P=.26 P=.07 P=.41
a

Results are adjusted for the baseline measure of the outcome variable.

b

Missing Oswestry Disability Index scores: 0 at baseline, 5 at 4 wk, 5 at 3 mo, and 13 at 1 y; imputed using multiple imputation procedure.

c

Significant value.

d

Missing average low back pain scores: 3 at baseline, 3 at 4 wk, 5 at 3 mo, and 13 at 1 y, imputed using multiple imputation procedure.