Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 27;63(6):591–598. doi: 10.1093/cz/zow114

Table 2.

GLMM of the relationship between FID and territory identity (random effect), susceptibility of prey to predation (covariate), whether the observation was made within 100 m from or more than 500 m away from the nest (distance to nest; fixed effect), body mass (covariate), the interaction between susceptibility and distance to nest and hawk species

Source F df P Estimate SE
Susceptibility 4.66 1, 670.1 0.031 0.051 0.023
Distance to nest 188.39 1, 954.4 < 0.0001 −0.086 0.006
Body mass 567.34 1, 963.2 < 0.0001 0.358 0.015
Hawk species 3.60 1, 28.2 0.07 0.025 0.013
Susceptibility × distance to nest 9.75 1, 926.9 0.0019 −0.042 0.014
Susceptibility × body mass 4.72 1, 457.5 0.030 −0.100 0.046

Notes: The random effect of territory size had a variance of 0.0028 (SE = 0.0011), 95% CI 0.00059, 0.00503, accounting for 6.3% of the variance while the random effect of species had a variance of 0.0079 (SE = 0.0032), 95% CI 0.0016, 0.0143, accounting for 17.9% of the variance.