Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 21;62(2):79–87. doi: 10.1093/cz/zow034

Table 1.

Evaluation of capture–recapture multistate models for Eurasian coots nesting in the urban area of Łódź, central Poland

Model QAICC ΔQAICC QAICC weight Np QDeviance
(1) φ (.) p (s) ψ (urban zones) 209.96 0.00 0.30 4 201.59
(2) φ (s) p (s) ψ (urban zones) 211.56 1.60 0.13 5 201.01
(3) φ (urban zones) p (s) ψ (urban zones) 211.66 1.70 0.13 5 201.11
(4) φ (urban gradient) p (s) ψ (urban zones) 211.80 1.84 0.12 5 201.24
(5) φ (.) p (s) ψ (.) 212.19 2.23 0.10 3 205.98
(6) φ (.) p (s) ψ (urban gradient) 212.77 2.81 0.07 4 204.40
(7) φ (urban zones) p (s) ψ (.) 213.69 3.73 0.05 4 205.32
(8) φ (.) p (s) ψ (s) 213.72 3.76 0.05 4 205.35
(9) φ (urban gradient) p (s) ψ (.) 213.87 3.91 0.04 4 205.51
(10) φ (t) p (s) ψ (urban zones) 216.75 6.79 0.01 8 199.38
(11) φ (.) p (s) ψ (t) 218.11 8.15 0.01 7 203.06

where φ – survival probability, p – resighting probability, ψ – probability of transition between the states. Model subscripts: (urban zones) – differences between highly and low urbanized zones, (urban gradient) – linear trend along the urban zones, (s) – differences between states, (t) – time dependence (year-to-year variation), (.) – constant.