Table 21.
Semisupervised algorithm for breast image classification.
| Reference | Descriptor | Image type | Number of images | Key finding |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cordeiro et al. [166] | (1) Zernike moments have been used for the feature extraction. | — | 685 | (1) Semisupervised Fuzzy GrowCut algorithm utilized. (2) For the fatty-tissue classification this method achieved 91.28% Accuracy. |
|
| ||||
| Cordeiro et al. [167] | — | Mammogram | 322 | (1) Semisupervised Fuzzy GrowCut as well as the Fuzzy GrowCut algorithm utilized for tumors, region segmentation. |
|
| ||||
| Nawel et al. [168] | — | — | — | (1) Semisupervised Support Vector Machine (S3VM) utilized. (2) This experiment shows impressive results on the DDSM database. |
|
| ||||
| Zemmal et al. [169] | — | DDSM | — | (1) Transductive semisupervised learning technique using (TSVM) utilized for classification along with different features. |
|
| ||||
| Zemmal et al. [170] | — | — | 200 | (1) Semisupervised Support Vector Machine (S3VM) utilized with various kernels. |
|
| ||||
| Zemmal et al. [171] | (1) GLCM (2) Hu moments (3) Central Moments | Mammogram | — | (1) Transductive Semisupervised learning technique used for image classification. (2) This experiment shows impressive results on DDSM database. |
|
| ||||
| Peikari et al. [172] | (1) Mean, Mode, Standard Deviation, Media, Skewness, Kurtosis | Histopathological | 322 | (1) The Ordering Points to Identify the Clustering Structure (OPTICS) method utilized for image classification [173]. |