Table 5.
Cohesion outcomes according to perceived ethnic density: Odds ratios for better outcomesa (95% confidence intervals).b
| Regeneration areas (N = 1,342) |
Surrounding areas (N = 769) |
Other areas (N = 1,747) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Belonging | |||
| Hardly mixed | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Fairly mixed | 1.07 (0.63, 1.81) | 0.84 (0.61, 1.14) | 0.84 (0.49, 1.43) |
| Very mixed | 1.46 (1.11, 1.91) | 1.49 (1.24, 1.80) | 1.22 (0.70, 2.11) |
| Inclusion | |||
| Hardly mixed | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Fairly mixed | 1.32 (0.82, 2.12) | 0.72 (0.62, 0.82) | 0.92 (0.55, 1.54) |
| Very mixed | 1.85 (1.23, 2.79) | 0.96 (0.87, 1.07) | 1.26 (0.72, 2.19) |
| Neighborhood interaction | |||
| Hardly mixed | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Fairly mixed | 1.64 (0.91, 2.97) | 0.89 (0.63, 1.26) | 0.94 (0.66, 1.34) |
| Very mixed | 2.21 (1.74, 2.82) | 1.17 (0.69, 1.97) | 1.27 (0.81, 1.99) |
| Neighbor familiarity | |||
| Hardly mixed | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Fairly mixed | 1.59 (1.01, 2.49) | 0.97 (0.72, 1.29) | 1.28 (1.03, 1.60) |
| Very mixed | 1.29 (0.81, 2.03) | 1.22 (0.60, 2.45) | 1.38 (1.01, 1.87) |
| Neighborly concern | |||
| Hardly mixed | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Fairly mixed | 1.50 (0.73, 3.09) | 0.90 (0.70, 1.16) | 1.15 (0.99, 1.34) |
| Very mixed | 1.74 (1.01, 2.99) | 1.01 (0.67, 1.51) | 1.36 (0.89, 2.08) |
| Neighbor honesty | |||
| Hardly mixed | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Fairly mixed | 1.65 (0.62, 4.39) | 1.01 (0.81, 1.26) | 1.36 (0.98, 1.88) |
| Very mixed | 1.10 (0.48, 2.52) | 0.93 (0.77, 1.12) | 1.54 (0.98, 2.42) |
Note. aAdjusted for age group, sex, household type, employment status, citizenship, and years in area.
b95% confidence intervals based on robust standard errors accounting for clustering within area.