Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 25;97(6):1662–1668. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0292

Table 3.

Agreement between three immunoassays measuring antibody responses against the CT antigen Pgp3

MBA-positive (N = 237) MBA-negative (N = 332)
LFA positive (% [95% CI]) LFA negative (% [95% CI]) LFA positive (% [95% CI]) LFA negative (% [95% CI])
ELISA-fresh-ROC Positive 86.1 (80.9–90.1) 0.8 (0.14–3.3) 1.8 (0.7–4.1) 2.1 (0.9–4.5)
Negative 10.5 (7.1–15.3) 2.5 (1.0–5.7) 3.3 (1.7–6.0) 92.8 (89.3–95.2)
ELISA-fresh-MM Positive 96.2 (92.7–98.1) 1.7 (0.5–4.6) 3.6 (2.0–6.4) 7.5 (5.0–11.0)
Negative 0.4 (0.02–2.7) 1.7 (0.5–4.6) 1.5 (0.6–3.7) 87.3 (83.2–90.6)
ELISA-precoated-ROC Positive 82.7 (77.1–87.1) 0.8 (0.14–3.3) 1.2 (0.4–3.3) 1.8 (0.7–4.1)
Negative 13.9 (9.9–19.1) 2.5 (1.0–5.7) 3.9 (2.2–6.8) 93.1 (89.6–95.5)
ELISA-precoated-MM Positive 96.2 (92.7–98.1) 1.3 (0.3–4.0) 3.3 (1.7–6.0) 3.9 (2.2–6.8)
Negative 0.4 (0.02–2.7) 2.1 (0.8–5.1) 1.8 (0.7–4.1) 91.0 (87.2–93.7)

CI = confidence interval; CT = Chlamydia trachomatis; ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; LFA = lateral flow assay; MBA = multiplex bead array; MM = fixed mixture model; Pgp3 = protein plasmid gene product 3; ROC = receiver operator characteristic. A set of 579 samples (provenance of samples detailed in Table 1) were tested for antibody responses using MBA, ELISA, and LFA. Ten samples were inconclusive on LFA and those data were excluded from analysis (final N = 569). Data shown are percentage of samples that fall into the indicated classification with 95% CIs shown in parentheses.