Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 8;13(2):e0191956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191956

Table 1. Results of best models explaining health parameters (body mass, ectoparasite infection intensity, tarsus skin yellowness, face skin yellowness) of urban kestrel nestlings.

Significant values in bold (n = 154 individuals, 91 different nest sites between 2010–2015).

Response variable Estimate SE Chi2 Df P(>Chi2) R2 for GLMM AICc
Body mass 54.13 355.90
(Intercept) 0.12 0.10 0.224
Wing length 0.74 0.06 147.41 1 <0.001
Wing length^2 -0.30 0.04 44.90 1 <0.001
Sex a 0.31 0.12 7.20 1 0.007
Ecto-parasite infection 12.86 243.60
(Intercept) -1.25 0.26 <0.001
Laying date -0.37 0.15 5.80 1 0.016
Face skin yellowness 0.40 0.15 6.62 1 0.010
Tarsus skin yellowness 228.60
(Intercept) -1.89 5.05 -0.38 0.708
Face skin yellowness 24.05 226.60
(Intercept) -0.21 0.13 0.101
Sex a 0.34 0.15 5.03 1 0.025
Age -0.26 0.08 11.56 1 <0.001
Laying date 0.13 0.08 2.93 1 0.087
Urban gradient 0.19 0.08 6.10 1 0.014

a: Sex(male) was the reference category.