Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 8;13(2):e0192254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192254

Table 5. Relationship between prevalence of myofascial pain and age, sex, menarche, and school (Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil, 2016).

Characteristics Myofascial [n (%)] Prevalence Ratio (95% CI) p value
Yes No Total
Age (y)
10 24 (9.2) 236 (90.8) 260 1.00
11 31 (9.7) 290 (90.3) 321 1.04 (0.62–1.73) 0.861
12 17 (8.2) 190 (91.8) 207 0.88 (0.49–1.61) 0.700
13 13 (14.9) 74 (85.1) 87 1.61 (0.86–3.03) 0.134
14 11 (18.6) 48 (81.4) 59 2.01 (1.04–3.89) 0.036
Sex
Female 66 (12.7) 452 (87.3) 518 1.76 (1.17–2.66)
1.00
0.007
Male 30 (7.21) 386 (92.79) 416
Menarche
Yes 27 (14.4) 160 (85.6) 187 1.22 (0.77–1.92)
1.00
0.391
No 39 (11.8) 291 (88.1) 330
School
Private 9 (7.9) 105 (92.1) 114 1.00
1.34 (0.69–2.59)
0.379
Public 87 (10.3) 733 (89.4) 820

CI, confidence interval; TMD, temporomandibular disorder

A p value < 0.05 is considered significant, as determined by Poisson regression analysis. Significant values are shown in bold.