Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Genet. 2018 Jan 1;50(2):229–237. doi: 10.1038/s41588-017-0009-4

Fig. 6. Predictive power of GWAS- and MTAG-based polygenic scores.

Fig. 6

Incremental R2 is the increase in R2 from a linear regression of the trait on the polygenic score and covariates, relative to a linear regression of the trait on only covariates. The plotted incremental R2’s (and differences in incremental R2’s) are the sample-size-weighted means across the replication cohorts (HRS and Add Health, combined N = 12,641), with 95% intervals. See Supplementary Note for details and cohort-level results. (a) Incremental R2 of MTAG-based and GWAS-based polygenic scores. (b) Incremental R2 of polygenic scores constructed from the MTAG results for the predicted trait (“own-trait score”) or MTAG results for each of the other traits (“other-trait score”). The x-axis indicates the trait being predicted, and the bar color indicates which trait’s polygenic score is used. (c) Difference in incremental R2 between the GWAS- and the MTAG-based PGS. Red dots indicate the theoretically predicted gains in prediction accuracy (Online Methods). (d) Difference in incremental R2 between own-trait scores and the mean of the incremental R2’s from the other-trait scores.