Table 2.

Distribution of care review domains

Author	Systems analysis	Functional department	Educational output	Standardized process	Structured case classification	Feedback from and to the team	Human factor assessment	Outcome consideration	Non-punitive	Recognition of excellence	Referral process	Multidisciplinary	Process leadership	Reviewer training	Case blinding/anonymity	Implementation of improvement recommendations	Number of components identified
Agee	X	X	X	X	X	X	0	X	0	0	X	0	X	X	0	X	11
Bender	X	0	X	X	X	0	0	X	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5
Berk	0	X	0	0	X	X	0	X	0	0	X	0	0	0	X	0	7
Branowicki	0	X	X	X	X	0	0	X	X	X	0	0	X	X	0	X	10
Chan	X	X	X	X	X	X	0	X	X	0	X	0	X	X	X	X	12
Corcoran	X	0	0	0	0	0	0	X	X	X	0	X	X	X	0	X	8
Diaz	X	X	0	0	X	X	X	0	0	0	X	0	X	X	0	X	9
Edwards	X	X	X	X	X	0	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	0	0	13
George	0	0	0	0	0	X	X	0	X	0	0	0	X	X	0	0	4
Helmreich	X	0	0	0	0	X	X	0	X	0	X	0	0	0	0	0	5
Hitchings	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	0	X	X	X	X	0	X	14
Kadar	X	0	0	0	0	0	X	0	X	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5
Katz	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	0	X	0	0	0	X	0	11
Lee JH	X	X	X	X	X	0	X	X	X	0	X	0	X	X	0	X	11
Maddox	X	0	X	X	X	0	0	0	X	0	X	0	X	X	0	0	7
McKay/Bowie	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	0	X	0	0	0	0	0	0	10
McVeigh	X	0	0	0	X	0	0	X	X	0	X	0	0	0	0	0	7
Meeks	X	0	0	0	X	X	X	X	X	0	X	0	0	0	0	0	8
Nolan	X	X	X	X	0	X	X	X	X	0	X	0	X	X	0	0	10
Pagano	X	X	X	X	X	0	X	X	X	0	X	0	X	X	X	0	11
Spath	X	0	X	X	0	X	0	X	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6
Spigelman	X	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	X	X	X	0	0	3
Stekelenburg	X	0	X	X	X	0	0	X	X	0	X	X	X	X	0	0	9
Strayer	X	X	X	X	X	X	0	0	X	0	X	0	X	X	0	0	10
Thielen	X	X	0	0	X	0	0	0	0	0	X	0	X	X	0	X	7
Thompson	X	0	0	0	X	0	0	X	0	0	X	0	0	0	0	0	5
Calder/Forster	X	X	X	X	X	0	X	X	X	0	X	X	X	X	0	X	13
Cosby	X	0	0	0	X	0	X	0	0	0	0	X	0	0	0	0	5
Lovett	X	X	X	X	X	0	X	X	0	0	X	X	0	0	0	0	9
Reznek/Jepson	X	0	0	0	X	X	X	X	X	0	X	0	X	X	X	X	11
Carbo	X	X	X	X	X	X	0	0	X	0	X	X	X	X	0	X	12
Pierluissi	X	0	X	X	X	0	0	X	X	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6
Wu/Provonost	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	0	0	0	X	14
Vincent	X	X	0	0	X	X	X	0	0	0	0	0	X	X	0	X	8
Wolochynowych	X	0	0	0	X	0	X	X	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6