Table VI.

The results of comparative analysis of our data and 3 GEO datasets.

Dataset	Our data	GDS3057	GDS1059	GDS2251
Our data		47.8 (51.8)	51.9 (59.8)	47.8 (78.3)
GDS3057	15.5		43.3 (47.4)	39.3 (58.1)
GDS1059	31.3	20.9		35.3 (64.2)
GDS2251	21.7	10.0	27.1

Only 238 genes identified as differentially expressed in our data (using AML-array, RT-qPCR and proteomics) were considered. The numbers refer to the percentage of concordant genes (the same trend in expression; regular font; the numbers in parentheses include also partially concordant genes) or discordant genes (the opposite trend; italics). Each percentage value was calculated based on the number of genes represented in both compared data sets (214–229).