Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017 Sep 23;50(2):125–132.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.08.001

Table 2.

Student-level Average Percent School Breakfast Program Participation Before and During Implementation of only the Grab-and-Go Component of the Project BreakFAST Intervention among a Cohort of Rural Minnesota High School Students

Mean Standard deviation Median Range P values for changea,b
Overall Sample (N=364)
Time 1c 7.6 13.7 1.2 0–81.9
Time 2d 10.0 17.7 1.3 0–92.2 Time 2 versus Time 1: .29
Time 3e 21.9 25.6 11.3 0–95.2 Time 3 versus Time 1: <.001
Time 3 versus Time 2: <.001

Students Eligible for Free/Reduced-Price School Meals (n=126)
Time 1c 13.9 18.8 5.4 0–81.9
Time 2d 19.5 24.7 7.6 0–92.2 Time 2 versus Time 1: .71
Time 3e 30.7 30.5 22.2 0–95.2 Time 3 versus Time 1: <.001
Time 3 versus Time 2: <.001

Students Not Eligible for Free/Reduced-Price School Meals (n=238)
Time 1c 4.3 8.4 0.6 0–44.6
Time 2d 5.0 9.3 0.6 0–46.1 Time 2 versus Time 1: .70
Time 3e 17.2 21.2 7.8 0–87.0 Time 3 versus Time 1: <.001
Time 3 versus Time 2: <.001

Students of Non-Hispanic White Race (n=284)
Time 1c 6.2 11.7 0.9 0–66.3
Time 2d 8.0 14.7 1.2 0–89.9 Time 2 versus Time 1: .32
Time 3e 19.7 23.5 9.8 0–90.1 Time 3 versus Time 1: <.001
Time 3 versus Time 2: <.001

Students of Hispanic Ethnicity or a Non-white Race (n=80)
Time 1c 13.0 18.5 4.6 0–81.9
Time 2d 17.1 24.5 2.9 0–92.2 Time 2 versus Time 1: .93
Time 3e 29.5 30.9 19.8 0–95.2 Time 3 versus Time 1: <.001
Time 3 versus Time 2: <.001
a

Models are based on log-transformed percent School Breakfast Program participation. The overall sample model includes a random effect of school and the following fixed effect components (P value): time (Time 1 P<.001, Time 2 P<.001, Time 3=reference), wave assignment (Wave 1 P=.51, Wave 2 = reference), eligibility for free/reduced-price school meals (P<.001), ethnicity/race (P=.64), chronic absenteeism (P=.32), and baseline grade level (P=.36). The P values presented in the table are adjusted values using the Tukey-Kramer method to account for multiple comparisons. The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) for the overall model is 4618.6.

b

Fit was also examined for the following subsample models: Students Eligible for Free/Reduced-Price School Meals (AIC=1645.6), Students Not Eligible for Free/Reduced-Price School Meals (AIC=2987.9), Students of Non-Hispanic White Race (AIC=3601.0), Students of Hispanic Ethnicity or a Non-white Race (AIC=1012.3).

c

Time 1 represents the first baseline school year of participation for incoming 9th and 10th grade students.

d

Time 2 represents the second baseline school year of participation for 10th and 11th grade students.

e

Time 3 represents participation of 11th and 12th grade students during the school year of implementation.