Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec 7;218(2):254.e1–254.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.603

Table 2.

Derivation and internal refinement multivariable regression odds estimates for cesarean delivery

Derivation Cohort Internal Refinement Cohort
Characteristic Adjusted OR (95% CI) P value Adjusted OR (95% CI) P value
Nulliparous 7.84 (4.33–14.20) <0.001 3.77(2.01–7.06) <0.001
GA ≥ 40 weeks 3.22 (1.99–5.21) <0.001 1.28 (0.77–2.12) 0.33a
BMI category before deliveryb 1.42 (1.17–1.74) <0.001 1.50 (1.22–1.86) <0.001
Height categoryc 1.29 (1.04–1.61) 0.02 1.38 (1.09–1.74) 0.007
Modified Bishop at induction 0.80 (0.69–0.94) 0.008 0.82 (0.70–0.96) 0.01
AUC 0.79 (0.74–0.83) 0.73 (0.67–0.78)

Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; GA, gestational age; BMI, body mass index

a

In the internal refinement set, gestational age ≥ 40 weeks did not reach statistical significance, but was retained since gestational age is known to be a risk factor for cesarean delivery.

b

BMI was separated into normal (<25.0 kg/m2), overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/m2), Obesity- Class 1 (30.0–34.9 kg/m2), Obesity-Class 2 (35.0–39.9 kg/m2), Obesity-Class 3 (≥40.0 kg/m2), and entered as an ordinal variable with BMI <25.0 kg/m2 used as the reference (e.g. from normal weight to overweight and then from overweight to obese) there was a 42% increase in risk of cesarean).

c

Height was reverse coded (decreasing height associated with increasing risk), categorized into (<62.0″, 62.0″–63.9″, 64.0″–65.9″, ≥66″), and entered as an ordinal variable